Bug #671

jcom.hub adress

Added by Renaud Rubiano over 8 years ago. Updated over 8 years ago.

Status:ClosedStart date:2011-02-03
Priority:NormalDue date:
Assignee:Théo de la Hogue% Done:

0%

Category:-Spent time:-
Target version:MVC for 0.6
Branch: OS:

Description

If I send a message "address" to the jcom.hub, it will return his address as we know.
But if I send a message "dump" to the same jcom.hub, the adress is not the same

In this example, the two addresss are "/udpsender" and "/"


----------begin_max5_patcher----------
1503.3oc0Zk0aiaCD9YmeEDZA5SoNjT2sujBzazhtX61mZVTPKQ6vsRhBTT6
lzE6+8NjTNw14vVxRtowH5fhRblu4atj8mNal2B4M7FOzWg9SzrYe5rYyrCY
FXV24y7JY2jUvZrSyqj2zvVw8N2cMM+FscbQkPudPYqtfq02VycOYOOz65tz
RYkthUZuf22nDrh02Tsh2vqzLsPV8WJdl1cuQ3n43yQDZnYGtaycOup1RQEr
XVgitwhzH9G6hPnvszsBLc10hpUO4SOLvdRx1Oem1XW.R2nhbq7KW79ujh8L
i84yNyr47iDEyaKqmBTLzOXBQwse5CAEIoCAEq3eDt4G.h0JQkF8le5G9w25
sW.aKUmzaUOEmZzVJwhowV1DE+jpN9QT8jQW0+ku66mdM222o4XeytnjAn4w
ioqCKOG39MSg2SfS6lHumse5Cx6IZH.YlrrDT1G.jJ16gkiqPEbTkrDk2hJk
4sE7ImREPHVkO0AHg3AvoBFQuoFzEvgbU08Z3z4NkRsZqKTZTv.Tc5Hp5BPs
OJWoiDNhS8cHf0ofFuG33wbJBGQ3PY7HPYf3CdLn8Fp47t+OY3DIg5hgruvv
9ODnFy7OuGBpLW1j4vqKf3F7hmGlNcTIZpCh72CDQeHDEMlIp5XQim2EcnAa
VmxAOfxdGaRSGZgDUnKy4.CRTaxBitxKWXDbz5InkHHGcNZwsn175q7FEuvL
YgT4tO77HRZDN4tD89Q33j.yQwX3JjGOu+ixKwOmQfF5Jfx4xt1OtOdtwitU
nlo.7wj7u4inKMfIZgTVvYOvpnuli.0WT1Vh9.qnkiVJUHynJVUtrjm6F9JO
zk1CtHmuj0VnQXzkPYpRkPeKfPiu4CmP8C8M1KZHN0ZGC7I9wvPjmppsAX8b
k+ZMdgNKY+LdQjw13cc6hNalIDiRVrqM62M9Mc9QMFGIFphq+nT82n1FP8P+
w29584PM8wqWGbJvlzOzOZ.wqoiYAwZVMuT9AAGPIN5mYkxRFZowQw.caN8C
ILxlbvkpUK5yz2Dx+QdwG3ZQFyabHztNXItBtHQwtc8o.zf3wD0eKz5wuxts
4bzuUH.vWgd8RtX4R3fu.8FdEqMG8l1EBVk7IMAVjLLlFFjZNJgPhiBeZSvg
L8iyDjteKPZWOPNyQXuL.Iiaefl33ys0vgDMPvBH6fFIWhtygXtMRCKSe48C
IUqV+nJDU7LYakd2pTlVDLlrwqjgFzKDLcLQPn9DSoJb07sJD9kOM0.Z6MRg
KPQpcmeu5TMDOln7qHv1ZEeo3FjQm+5qTuhBCYN1xVM0jXMCH3QIyDLMOGlz
TxRe9LbN.LvklKMc..3fpcnlUcOIbgTAHxlx+hUaPJcAg1byyW3zi02kqECm
un6M5P5mVRWKrP6jf8ydE7HWzjhqaUUHHFFjjApH0U.UiVAJyQ0h1tfI3nlZ
5evlgu6ndUOZ5y2LgEnSb3rq1TRbu5naLalXE3iMsM3ld.Em6ZrcPfQ3n9R4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-----------end_max5_patcher-----------

History

#1 Updated by Théo de la Hogue over 8 years ago

  • Status changed from Assigned to Resolved

the last commit on "supports" branch should resolve this bug
by dumping the absolute address instead of the relative address.

#2 Updated by Renaud Rubiano over 8 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Closed

It works !!

Also available in: Atom PDF